<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Camelot 2003 Merlot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antiwinesnob.com/2008/02/20/red/camelot-2003-merlot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antiwinesnob.com/2008/02/20/red/camelot-2003-merlot/</link>
	<description>Bargain Wine Reviews, News and Clues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:49:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan n</title>
		<link>http://antiwinesnob.com/2008/02/20/red/camelot-2003-merlot/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwinesnob.com/2008/02/20/red/camelot-2003-merlot/#comment-292</guid>
		<description>So...when I first opened it... Kerosene was the initial thought. Would have to agree with TA... BUT... Recork and let sit for a day and it smooths out nicely to be a very very nice inexpensive wine.not sure decanting is enough...it prob needs a day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230;when I first opened it&#8230; Kerosene was the initial thought. Would have to agree with TA&#8230; BUT&#8230; Recork and let sit for a day and it smooths out nicely to be a very very nice inexpensive wine.not sure decanting is enough&#8230;it prob needs a day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. A.</title>
		<link>http://antiwinesnob.com/2008/02/20/red/camelot-2003-merlot/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>T. A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 01:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwinesnob.com/2008/02/20/red/camelot-2003-merlot/#comment-104</guid>
		<description>I bought this wine to try.  I have to say it was the most &quot;GOD AWFUL&quot; wine I have ever tasted.  I would compare it to a glass of vinegar.  I have never experienced tasting a &quot;fortified&quot; type of wine before but have heard of them and I&#039;m curious if Muskatel or Thunderbird would compare.  I would never buy this again.  The company that distributes this wine should lower the price or, better yet, give it away and stop selling it.

And as for your website...&quot;Anti Wine Snob&quot; couldn&#039;t be further from the truth. Read the review above...&quot;snifftest&quot;, &quot;round&quot;, &quot;smooth&quot;, &quot;mellow&quot;...  How about just giving a review that most people who drink wine can relate to.  For those of you who are like me and want a wine that has a good flavor and is not terribly expensive, this one is NOT it.  Try Fat Bastard Merlot or Two Vines by Columbia Crest.
-----------------------------------------

Hi T.A.,

I&#039;m a little confused as to why you are calling the Camelot Merlot fortified, which, if I understand the term correctly, refers to adding alcohol to the wine so that it is stronger in alcohol than the natural fermentation process would otherwise provide.  I don&#039;t believe the Camelot Merlot fits this description -- I even checked it out on their website (link is at the end of my review).   

And as for my website, well, I suppose I thought it would be helpful to provide descriptors to my tasting experience that ranged beyond &quot;tastes good&quot;.  I think &quot;round&quot; and &quot;smooth&quot; are helpful, modest -- and quite accurate -- adjectives.  If you have better words, I&#039;m certainly open to hearing them! 

.....&lt;em&gt;AWS&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought this wine to try.  I have to say it was the most &#8220;GOD AWFUL&#8221; wine I have ever tasted.  I would compare it to a glass of vinegar.  I have never experienced tasting a &#8220;fortified&#8221; type of wine before but have heard of them and I&#8217;m curious if Muskatel or Thunderbird would compare.  I would never buy this again.  The company that distributes this wine should lower the price or, better yet, give it away and stop selling it.</p>
<p>And as for your website&#8230;&#8221;Anti Wine Snob&#8221; couldn&#8217;t be further from the truth. Read the review above&#8230;&#8221;snifftest&#8221;, &#8220;round&#8221;, &#8220;smooth&#8221;, &#8220;mellow&#8221;&#8230;  How about just giving a review that most people who drink wine can relate to.  For those of you who are like me and want a wine that has a good flavor and is not terribly expensive, this one is NOT it.  Try Fat Bastard Merlot or Two Vines by Columbia Crest.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Hi T.A.,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a little confused as to why you are calling the Camelot Merlot fortified, which, if I understand the term correctly, refers to adding alcohol to the wine so that it is stronger in alcohol than the natural fermentation process would otherwise provide.  I don&#8217;t believe the Camelot Merlot fits this description &#8212; I even checked it out on their website (link is at the end of my review).   </p>
<p>And as for my website, well, I suppose I thought it would be helpful to provide descriptors to my tasting experience that ranged beyond &#8220;tastes good&#8221;.  I think &#8220;round&#8221; and &#8220;smooth&#8221; are helpful, modest &#8212; and quite accurate &#8212; adjectives.  If you have better words, I&#8217;m certainly open to hearing them! </p>
<p>&#8230;..<em>AWS</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

